House of Assembly: Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Contents

TREASURER'S REMARKS

The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:40): My question is to the Treasurer. Did the Treasurer have a duty as Treasurer to accept a briefing on the cost blowout on the Adelaide Oval upgrade at the Stadium Management Authority briefing on 3 March so that he could properly monitor a taxpayer-funded project? The Treasurer is the minister responsible for the Adelaide Oval project and went into the 3 March meeting knowing of a cost blowout as it was previously advised to him on 19 February.

The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Federal/State Relations, Minister for Defence Industries) (14:41): As I have said in my statement yesterday in relation to—

Members interjecting:

The SPEAKER: Order!

The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: —the meeting with Leigh Whicker, I did not consider that to be a formal briefing and I said as such in my statement yesterday. In a subsequent minute of the SMA meeting with the government steering committee, it was noted in that minute that these figures could not and should not be relied upon; they could either go up or down.

Members interjecting:

The SPEAKER: Order!

The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: The government, at that stage, until just recently when it changed, there was no increased financial exposure for government because our policy was a figure of $450 million capped.

Members interjecting:

The SPEAKER: Order!

The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: As we have said now and what we said then is that—and this is where the debate gets confusing in that we have never said—

Mrs Redmond interjecting:

The SPEAKER: Order!

The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: The government was in a position to provide a capital grant to the SMA: $450 million capped. That was not contingent upon the final cost. They are always able, should they wish at their discretion, to source other funding sources as they are now.


PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS
MEMBERS
GET INVOLVED
ABOUT PARLIAMENT
VISIT
VISIT
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
CONTACT