Electoral Services

114 The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (25 October 2018). Can the Attorney-General advise:

1. What is the explanation for the more than $900,000 increase in land and improvements for Electoral Services?

2. What is the explanation for the $420,000 increase in other non-current liabilities for Electoral Services?

The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer): The Attorney-General has provided the following advice:

The first variation is outlined in Budget Paper 4, Volume 2, page 54.

The increase in 'Other non-current liabilities' relates to the lease incentive associated with the new lease for head office accommodation for the Electoral Commission.